Zou, P X W and Zhang, G (2009) Comparative study on the perception of construction safety risks in China and Australia. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(7), pp. 620-627. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Safety is a major concern in the construction industry because fatalities and injuries from construction work bring great losses to individuals, organizations, and societies as a whole. This paper aims to understand how construction personnel perceive safety risks in China as compared with those in Australia. Postal questionnaire surveys were used to collect data on safety risk perceptions from the two nations. The safety risk factors were assessed using a risk significance index based on the likelihood of occurrences and the impacts on safety performance. The survey results revealed that in China the main perception of safety risks came from human-and/or procedure-related issues, with "low/no safety education" paramount, followed by "inadequate fire prevention and electrical prevention procedures," etc. In contrast, the major safety risks perceived in Australia were related to the environment and physical site conditions with "contamination of land, water and air" ranked first, followed by "unforeseen excavation of soil," etc. To minimize construction safety risks in China, this paper suggests that the government should develop collective legislation and safety protection procedures, and enforce safety education and training to all site participants. Risks related to environmental and site conditions were generally realized by the Australia construction industry, which were not highly acknowledged in China. This may also bring imminent attention in this regard to the Chinese government.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Australia; China; compensation; labor relations; risk management; safety |
| Index terms: | Australia, education and training, labour relation, construction industry, prevention, compensation, land, fatalities, risk factor, risk management, construction work, contamination, comparative study, survey, risk perception, construction personnel, society, injury, legislation, safety performance, China, construction safety, excavation, questionnaire |
| Subjects: | health risk and incident analysis, economics, Geography, financial risk, occupational health and safety management, professional education, health conditions and diseases, industry analysis, communities and social development, environmental hazards, environmental health, workforce, risk assessment, data collection methods, research design and methodology, dispute resolution, real estate economics, operations management, legal systems, construction operations |
| Topics: | Geographical Context, Project Management, Research Practice, Cost Management, Health and Safety, Sustainability, Stakeholder Management, Risk Management, Human Resources, Supply Chain Management, Legal Issues, Urban Studies, Site Management, Education |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here