Ahuja, V; Yang, J and Shankar, R (2010) Benchmarking framework to measure extent of ICT adoption for building project management. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(5), pp. 538-545. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
This paper discusses a component of the research study conducted to provide construction organizations with a generic benchmarking framework to assess their extent of information communication technology (ICT) adoption for building project management processes. It defines benchmarking and discusses objectives of the required benchmarking framework and development of the framework. The study focused on ICT adoption by small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in the construction industry and with respect to SMEs it is important to understand processes, their indicators, and measures in the local context. Structure of the suggested benchmarking framework has been derived after extensive literature survey and a questionnaire survey conducted in the Indian construction industry. The suggested benchmarking process is an iterative process divided into four stages. It can be implemented at organization and industry levels for rating the construction organizations for ICT adoption and performance measurement. The framework has a generic structure and can be generalized and applied for other countries with due considerations.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | benchmarks; benchmarks; buildings; communication; construction management |
| Index terms: | project management process, project management, construction industry, performance measurement, construction organization, questionnaire, benchmarking, survey |
| Subjects: | project management theory and practice, performance measurement, industry analysis, organization, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Research Practice, Project Management, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here