Concept relation extraction from construction documents using natural language processing

Al Qady, M and Kandil, A (2010) Concept relation extraction from construction documents using natural language processing. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(3), pp. 294-302. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

The objective of this research is to present an innovative technique for managing the knowledge contained in construction contract documents to facilitate quick access and efficient use of such knowledge for project management and contract administration tasks. Knowledge Management has become the focus of a lot of scientific research during the second half of the 20th century as researchers discovered the importance of the knowledge resource to business organizations. Despite early expectations of improved document management techniques, document management systems used in the construction industry have failed to deliver the anticipated performance. Recent research attempts to utilize analysis of the contents of documents to improve document categorization and retrieval functions. It is hypothesized that natural language processing can be effectively used to perform document text analysis. The proposed system, technique for concept relation identification using shallow parsing (CRISP), utilizes a shallow parser to extract semantic knowledge from construction contract documents which can be used to improve electronic document management functions such as document categorization and retrieval. When compared with human evaluators, CRISP achieved almost 80% of the average kappa score attained by the evaluators, and approximately 90% of their F -measure score.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: computer aided operations; computerization; contract management; information management; information systems
Index terms: contract administration, construction contract, construction industry, project management, management system, contract management, text analysis, documents, information system, knowledge management
Subjects: analytical methods, contract type, information systems, industry analysis, professional development, project management theory and practice, contract management, management
Topics: Procurement, Research Practice, Project Management, Information Management, Contract Administration, Organizational Design, Digital Applications
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here