Integrated framework for quantifying and predicting weather-related highway construction delays

Apipattanavis, S; Sabol, K; Molenaar, K R; Rajagopalan, B; Xi, Y; Blackard, B and Patil, S (2010) Integrated framework for quantifying and predicting weather-related highway construction delays. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(11), pp. 1160-1168. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Constant exposure to the environment makes highway construction highly dependent on weather. However, highway construction contracts are often unclear about the potential influence of weather-related delays on highway construction project schedules. There is a need to discourage litigation arising from weather-related delays by including in contracts a reasonable number of nonwork days as a consequence of adverse weather and providing an equitable criteria for the course of action when the predictions in the contracts turn out to be inaccurate. To address this need, an integrated framework consisting of the following two key components is proposed: (1) identification of attributes of weather that cause construction delays and (2) generation of synthetic weather sequences using a stochastic weather generator to quantify and provide probabilistic forecasts of weather threshold values. The utility of this framework is demonstrated through its application to construction work on a project in Texas. The use of probabilistic forecast of construction delay attributes provided by a semiparametric weather generator in this research is an example of interdisciplinary study to help address this problem. The result of the research is better decision support for agencies who wish to author contracts that more equitably allow for the influence of weather during construction.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: contracts; critical path method; delay time; highway and road construction; scheduling; weather
Index terms: agency, exposure, critical path method, litigation, road construction, scheduling, construction work, weather, construction delay, decision support, highway construction
Subjects: civil engineering, dispute resolution, operations management, public and environmental health, air quality, operations research, decision analysis, sociology, project controls
Topics: Legal Issues, Project Management, Sustainability, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Time Control, Risk Management, Engineering Principles
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here