Blackman, I Q and Picken, D H (2010) Height and construction costs of residential high-rise buildings in Shanghai. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(11), pp. 1169-1180. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
A widely recognized theme of construction economics suggests that the cost of construction per square meter increases as building height rises. However, over a number of years, research conducted regarding the height and cost issue has established a classic relationship between the two factors which can be represented by a U-shaped curve. This paper describes the study of the height-cost relationship of high-rise residential buildings in Shanghai in terms of the total construction cost and elemental costs while considering the context and commonality of buildings. This research was developed as an extension of the previous work, which examined data for buildings in Hong Kong. Initial findings indicate that the curves illustrating the relationships between height and cost of residential buildings in Shanghai and Hong Kong exhibit different profiles. The dissimilarities indicate that different sets of criteria should be applied in the judgment of height that affects cost in different locations. In terms of elemental costs, the findings suggest that there are differences in the way these costs react to changes in the building height.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | buildings; high rise; construction cost; height |
| Index terms: | Shanghai, construction economics, high-rise building, high rise, Hong Kong, residential building, judgment, construction cost, building height, high-rise residential building |
| Subjects: | dispute resolution, construction type, financial and cost management, Geography, financial analysis, building performance |
| Topics: | Geographical Context, Cost Management, Construction Technology, Legal Issues, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here