Application of a SOM-based optimization algorithm in minimizing construction time for secant pile wall

Chen, J H; Su, M C and Huang, D Y (2010) Application of a SOM-based optimization algorithm in minimizing construction time for secant pile wall. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(11), pp. 1189-1195. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Construction time matters for activities where rental equipment must be used. The building of a secant pile wall requires the rental of equipment and finding the optimal sequence to minimize the construction time is one way to lower construction costs. In this study we develop an effective and efficient optimization algorithm, which we call self-organizing feature map (SOM)-based optimization (SOMO), to minimize the construction time. The algorithm is applied to a case study to obtain the optimal sequences for both primary and secondary bored piles for a secant pile wall. The new SOMO algorithm is developed based on the ability of the human brain to produce topologically ordered mapping, so as to exploit better solutions via updating the weighting vectors of the neurons in a self-organizing topological way that occurs in the evolution of the feature map for optimization. Given detailed building time of the 16 activities of each bored pile, we find that 143.92 h or 27.21% of the original construction can be saved. The optimal sequences for both primary and secondary bored piles are also determined. The practicability of the SOMO algorithm is substantiated.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction time; optimal sequencing; optimization; secant pile wall; self-organizing feature map; somo algorithm
Index terms: construction time, self-organizing, evolution, optimization algorithm, construction cost, case study, mapping
Subjects: data collection methods, project controls, spatial and geospatial analysis, sociology, algorithms, environmental science, financial and cost management
Topics: Research Practice, Cost Management, Digital Applications, Time Control, Sustainability, Organizational Design
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here