Project organizations as social networks

Chinowsky, P S; Diekmann, J and O'Brien, J (2010) Project organizations as social networks. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(4), pp. 452-458. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

High-performance teams achieve outcomes that exceed the expectations of the project and often demonstrate unique or innovative approaches within a final solution. The foundation of this high performance is the ability to focus on the success of the team over individual objectives. However, the recognition of this emphasis is based on the establishment of professional trust and strong communications between the team members. The social network model of construction introduced a dual-focused approach to enhancing these elements and creating high-performance project teams. The approach emphasizes balancing both a traditional project management emphasis on efficiency of communications with a focus on the social factors that move the project team from efficient to effective. In this paper, the model is extended to present the results of four studies of organizations that are full-service engineering companies that also provide construction oversight services. The paper presents the results of these studies in terms of the social network model and the achievement of high performance in the project teams. Analytical and graphical results are presented based on social network analysis techniques to provide a multiperspective analysis of the project teams.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: high-performance teams; knowledge management; knowledge-based systems; organizations; project communications; social factors
Index terms: project management, knowledge-based system, project team, social network, project communication, knowledge management, efficiency, social factor, social network analysis, project organization
Subjects: project management theory and practice, sociology, performance management, artificial intelligence, research methods, organizational theory, project delivery, professional development
Topics: Information Management, Quality Management, Project Management, Research Practice, Digital Applications
Descriptive scope: 2 CT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here