Chua, D K H; Yeoh, K W and Song, Y (2010) Quantification of spatial temporal congestion in four-dimensional computer-aided design. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(6), pp. 641-649. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
This paper further develops the models proposed by prior research in the field of workspace conflict using four-dimensional computer-aided design. The approach developed here analyzes spatial demand and supply from the perspective of construction operators, and a modeling methodology based on spatiotemporal utilization is proposed. The utilization factor model is developed to show that the criticality of the operator's spatiotemporal demand leads to worksite congestion and that congestion is a form of worksite conflict. The interference of other space entities increases the space demand, and this increment is quantified with a "dynamic space interference" index This indicator is developed to identify activity spaces which suffer congestion. A decision making tool, the "congestion penalty indicator," is developed which obtains a schedule-level value for analysis, evaluation, and comparison. Finally, a case study on the refurbishment of an oil refinery column is used to demonstrate the application of the above concepts in successfully identifying a better schedule with respect to on-site congestion.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | 4D CAD; site congestion; spatial analysis; temporal analysis; workspace |
| Index terms: | computer aided design, decision-making, methodology, column, site congestion, penalty, modelling, workspace, case study, quantification |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, computational design, analytical methods, site logistics, research methods, management, structural engineering, measurement and scaling, decision analysis, regulatory law |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Legal Issues, Site Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Stakeholder Management, Risk Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here