Enabling development of the transportation public-private partnership market in the United States

Garvin, M J (2010) Enabling development of the transportation public-private partnership market in the United States. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(4), pp. 402-411. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Public-private partnerships (PPP) for infrastructure development and management have received significant attention in academic, institutional, and political circles over roughly the last two decades. This attention was prompted, to a great extent, by early experiments with PPP-type arrangements in Australia, Canada, and the United States coupled with the United Kingdom's Private Finance Initiative policy-not to mention the experience of other parts of the world such as Asia, continental Europe, and South America. PPP policies and practices have evolved in other world regions, but the United States remains a relatively slow mover in this market. While varying explanations for this circumstance are plausible, the situation can play to America's advantage since the nation can capitalize upon the tested experience of its international counterparts. Drawing upon data and information collected from two principal sources: (1) case histories of PPP projects in North America to date and (2) a scanning tour of Australia, Portugal, Spain, and the United Kingdom in 2008, misconceptions regarding PPPs are clarified, contemporary international policies and practices are characterized, and recommendations for implementing PPPs for transportation infrastructure are made. The principal intent of this paper is to trigger a dialogue about PPPs and how they might improve America's infrastructure assets.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: infrastructure; partnerships; private sector; procurement; project delivery; public-private partnerships; United States
Index terms: Asia, private finance initiative, history, United States, experiment, infrastructure development, drawing, United Kingdom, transportation infrastructure, project delivery, Europe, Canada, Australia, Portugal, Spain, private sector, partnership
Subjects: data collection methods, technical documentation, contractual arrangements, project delivery, architectural and construction history, regions and continents, physical geography and landforms, Geography, infrastructure engineering, partnership management, industry analysis, infrastructure and transport systems
Topics: Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Stakeholder Management, Procurement, Design Practice
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here