Girmscheid, G and Brockmann, C (2010) Inter- and intraorganizational trust in international construction joint ventures. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(3), pp. 353-360. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
International joint ventures in construction often face a highly complex and dynamic environment because, in most instances, they are formed to build large-scale engineering projects. One can distinguish two organizational levels that together constitute the joint venture system: (1) the interorganizational level formed by the partners and (2) the intraorganizational level of the joint venture. The partners seek to reconcile their different interests on the interorganizational level, as each of them follows the goal of profit optimization. Here, formal control mechanisms are more important than trust. Actors on the intraorganizational level face the construction task. One of the primary requirements is to reduce the project complexity. Within the joint venture, many international construction joint ventures disentangle their responsibilities by functional separation and delegation of work. In a social group, delegation of work requires trust in the capability and willingness of others to perform their duties without supervision. Especially during the initial phase, international construction joint ventures are high-pressure environments without established teams. Trust is a mechanism that allows to reach goals efficiently within this setting. As a consequence, we can find a special form of trust in international construction joint ventures: necessitated general trust that is extended to everyone even without prior knowledge. These findings are new and have high practical relevance as trust proves to be a most important success factor.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | complexity; culture; international factors; international joint ventures; joint ventures; organizations; system theory; trust |
| Index terms: | supervision, international construction, joint venture, interorganizational, complexity, project complexity, duty, face, success factor, profit |
| Subjects: | economic analysis, health monitoring assessment and metrics, psychology, control systems, contractual role, strategic management, business, systems engineering, organizational theory |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Project Management, Engineering Principles, International Construction, Organizational Design, Contract Administration |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here