Hallowell, M R and Gambatese, J A (2010) Population and initial validation of a formal model for construction safety risk management. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(9), pp. 981-990. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
The transient, unique, and complex nature of construction projects makes safety management exceptionally difficult. Most construction safety efforts are applied in an informal fashion under the premise that simply allocating more resources to safety management will improve site safety. Currently, there is no mechanism by which construction-site safety professionals may formally evaluate safety risk and select safety program elements for implementation. This paper introduces and validates a risk-based safety and health analytical model that can be used to evaluate expected risk given specific worker activities, strategically select highly effective safety program elements for implementation when resources are limited, and quantify resulting risk once the identified safety elements have been implemented. Specifically, the paper has three primary objectives: (1) introduce a risk-based construction safety and health analytical model; (2) validate relevant data used to populate the model; and (3) illustrate the applications of the model in practice. The findings of this research indicate that the values used to populate the model are reliable and that the model has the potential to significantly improve construction safety management.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | labor issues; occupational safety; risk; risk management |
| Index terms: | population, risk management, occupational safety, construction safety, program, validation, implementation, analytical model, construction safety and health, safety management, construction project |
| Subjects: | occupational health and safety management, demography, software systems, theoretical framing, professional development, contractual arrangements, production management, environmental health, risk assessment |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Project Management, Procurement, Urban Studies, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Risk Management, Sustainability, Information Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here