Kim, B C and Reinschmidt, K F (2010) Probabilistic forecasting of project duration using Kalman filter and the earned value method. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(8), pp. 834-843. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
The earned value method (EVM) is recognized as a viable method for evaluating and forecasting project cost performance. However, its application to schedule performance forecasting has been limited due to poor accuracy in predicting project durations. Recently, several EVM-based schedule forecasting methods were introduced. However, these are still deterministic and have large prediction errors early in the project due to small sample size. In this paper, a new forecasting method is developed based on Kalman filter and the earned schedule method. The Kalman filter forecasting method (KFFM) provides probabilistic predictions of project duration at completion and can be used from the beginning of a project without significant loss of accuracy. KFFM has been programmed in an add-in for Microsoft Excel and it can be implemented on all kinds of projects monitored by EVM or any other S-curve approach. Applications on two real projects are presented here to demonstrate the advantages of KFFM in extracting additional information from data about the status, trend, and future project schedule performance and associated risks.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction management; forecasting; kalman filter; kalman filters; project controls; schedule management; scheduling |
| Index terms: | schedule performance, scheduling, project cost, accuracy, kalman filter, forecasting, sample size, s-curve, project control, duration |
| Subjects: | operations research, prediction and forecasting, research design and methodology, control systems, project controls, statistical analysis, economics, professional development |
| Topics: | Information Management, Research Practice, Project Management, Cost Management, Time Control |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here