Leung, M Y; Chan, Y S and Chong, A M L (2010) Chinese values and stressors of construction professionals in Hong Kong. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(12), pp. 1289-1298. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
The construction industry has been recognized as a stressful industry, and a great deal of stress is placed on various construction professionals (CPs). However, due to the different "values" among CPs in Hong Kong, susceptibility to stressors varies from individual to individual. People who grow up and live in different cultural environments have different values and this leads to different perceptions of stressors. This study aims to investigate the impact of Chinese values on the stressors of CPs in Hong Kong, one of the main cities in China. To achieve this aim, factor analysis, Pearson correlation analysis, and structural equation modeling were applied based on the survey data collected from CPs in Hong Kong. Four types of Chinese values and eight stressors are identified. The results reveal that: (1) social conventions value alleviate role ambiguity and poor workgroup relationship; (2) value of disciplined work ethos triggers work overload, although it alleviate poor workgroup relationship and work underload; (3) value of conservative personality alleviates work overload; (4) interpersonal integration value has indirect impacts on the various stressors; and (5) the objective poor working environment stressor has significant impact on the poor workgroup relationships and role ambiguity of individual CPs.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Chinese values; construction professionals; interpersonal; organization; stressors; task |
| Index terms: | structural equation modelling, survey, stressors, China, integration, personality, correlation analysis, Hong Kong, construction industry, construction professional, factor analysis |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, professional development, Geography, health conditions and diseases, organizational analysis, behavioral psychology, statistical analysis, industry analysis |
| Topics: | Health and Safety, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Information Management, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here