Impacts of stressors and stress on the injury incidents of construction workers in Hong Kong

Leung, M Y; Chan, Y S and Yuen, K W (2010) Impacts of stressors and stress on the injury incidents of construction workers in Hong Kong. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(10), pp. 1093-1103. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Construction workers (CWs) are the key and indispensable contributors to every construction project. Their psychological feelings greatly influence their behaviors and safety performance. To improve CWs' safety performance in dangerous working environment, the current research aims to identify the various stressors affecting two types of stress of CWs (i.e., job stress and emotional stress) and to explore the impacts of the two types of stress on CW injury incidents in Hong Kong. Eleven stressors were identified through factor analysis: work overload, role ambiguity, lack of autonomy, unfair reward and treatment, appropriate safety equipment, optimism, interrole conflict, poor workgroup relationship, lack of feedback, poor physical environment, and unsafe environment. The results of correlation and regression analyses reveal that (1) among the two types of stress identified, injury incident of CWs was found to be affected by emotional stress only, (2) emotional stress is predicted by work overload, interrole conflict, poor physical environment, unfair reward and treatment, and appropriate safety equipments, and (3) poor workgroup relationship, work overload, and interrole conflict predict job stress of CWs. Based on the result, various recommendations are suggested to employers on how to minimize CW injury incidents.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction workers; emotional stress; injury incidents; job stress; stressors
Index terms: regression analysis, safety equipment, construction worker, factor analysis, job stress, Hong Kong, safety performance, construction project, injury, stressors
Subjects: occupational health and safety management, health conditions and diseases, statistical analysis, management, production management, Geography, practitioner
Topics: Human Resources, Project Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Roles and Professions
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here