Liu, S S and Wang, C J (2010) Profit optimization for multiproject scheduling problems considering cash flow. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(12), pp. 1268-1278. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
This study investigates cash flow for profit optimization and handles scheduling problems in multiproject environment. By identifying the amount and timing of individual inflow or outflow at the end of each period, contractors can observe the cash flow at specific time points according to project progress. Since most companies handle multiple projects simultaneously, managing project finance becomes complicated and tough for contractors. Therefore, this study considers cash flow and the financial requirements of contractors working in a multiple-project environment and proposes a profit optimization model for multiproject scheduling problems using constraint programming. The current study also presents a hypothetical example involving three projects to illustrate capability of the proposed model and adopts various constraints, including credit limit (CL) and due dates, for scenario analysis. The analysis result demonstrates that setting CLs ensures smooth financial pressure by properly shifting activities, and assigning due dates for projects helps planners avoid project duration extension while maximizing overall project profit.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | cash flow; constraint programming; multiproject scheduling; profit optimization |
| Index terms: | project finance, duration, scenario analysis, planner, constraint programming, scheduling, cash flow, profit |
| Subjects: | financial management, project controls, policy studies, operations research, economic analysis, algorithms, profession |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Cost Management, Roles and Professions, Time Control, Governance, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here