PPP experiences in Indian cities: Barriers, enablers, and the way forward

Mahalingam, A (2010) PPP experiences in Indian cities: Barriers, enablers, and the way forward. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(4), pp. 419-429. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Recent studies indicate that India must invest more than $150 billion over the next 5 years in the development of urban infrastructure. Urban local bodies lack the financial resources and the capacity to develop these projects on their own, pointing to a large role that public-private partnerships (PPPs) need to play in the development of urban infrastructure. This paper uses a combination of archival sources, case studies, and insights from a recently concluded roundtable discussion on PPPs to highlight five key barriers that PPP projects face in the urban Indian context. These barriers are a distrust between the public and private sector, a lack of political willingness to develop PPPs, the absence of an enabling institutional environment for PPPs, a lack of project preparation capacity on the part of the public sector, and poorly designed and structured PPP projects. A series of measures that the Government of India has undertaken to enable PPPs are evaluated and it is observed that these programs address only three of the five barriers identified. A set of nine additional strategies emanating from the roundtable are then proposed, that, in addition to the existing measures outlined by the Government of India, can help comprehensively address the challenges that PPPs in urban infrastructure that India is facing. This could help improve the quantity and quality of infrastructure services in Indian cities.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: barriers; India; infrastructure; partnerships; private sector; private-public partnerships; strategies; urban development
Index terms: India, urban development, public sector, partnership, private sector, case study, program, urban infrastructure, face, strategy
Subjects: Geography, urban design, management, software systems, administrative law, industry analysis, infrastructure and transport systems, partnership management, data collection methods, psychology
Topics: Research Practice, Geographical Context, Business Strategy, Stakeholder Management, Legal Issues, Urban Studies, Digital Applications, Organizational Design
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here