Mitropoulos, P and Guillama, V (2010) Analysis of residential framing accidents, activities, and task demands. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(2), pp. 260-269. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Framing contractors have the highest rate of nonfatal incidents among specialty contractors. This case study analyzes 654 safety incidents that occurred over a period of 5 1/2 years in a large residential framing company. Accident analysis and interviews with safety and production experts identify the high-risk tasks, the errors that lead to incidents, and the task factors that increase the likelihood of incidents. The analysis resulted in a framework of five task factors that increase the task demands: (1) working platform constraints; (2) ergonomic postures constraints; (3) material/load handling requirements; (4) tool use/accuracy requirements; and (5) difficulties due to external forces. The combined effect of these factors determines the task difficulty and the likelihood of incidents. The paper discusses safety measures to reduce the task demands of the high-risk tasks, as opposed to measures that reduce exposure or mitigate the consequences. Reducing task demands can reduce the likelihood of accidents while at the same time increasing productivity. For practitioners, the study points to the need to understand the high-risk tasks and reduce task demands in their operations. The framework of the five task demand factors provides the "building blocks" of task difficulty for framing tasks and provides directions for further research in understanding and mitigating the combined effect of the task demand factors.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | accident prevention; accidents; errors; high-risk tasks; residential framing; safety; task demands |
| Index terms: | specialty contractor, productivity, case study, platform, safety measures, accuracy, framing, accident prevention, interview, exposure, practitioner |
| Subjects: | digital design, professional development, health safety and environment, public and environmental health, management, environmental health, practitioner, data collection methods, conceptual models, professional practice |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Sustainability, Roles and Professions, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here