Moussourakis, J and Haksever, C (2010) Project compression with nonlinear cost functions. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(2), pp. 251-259. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
This paper presents three mixed-integer linear programming models to assist project managers in making decisions to compress project completion time under realistic activity time-cost relationship assumptions. The models assume nonlinear activity time-cost functions that are rational functions that can be convex or concave. A user of the models needs to estimate an activity time between normal and crash times where the rate of increase in the cost of performing an activity changes significantly. An efficient piecewise linearization method is presented through which nonlinear cost functions can be approximated in a mixed-integer linear programming model. Each of the models focuses on a different objective a project manager may pursue, such as minimizing project completion subject to a crash budget constraint, or minimizing total project cost, or minimizing total cost under late completion penalties or minimizing total cost with early completion bonuses of a project contract. The paper also uses a simple example which has activities that have all the different types of cost functions discussed in the paper to demonstrate how each model can be used for a project manager's different objectives.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | compression; linearization; mixed-integer linear programming; nonlinear cost functions; project management; time-cost trade-off |
| Index terms: | project manager, budget constraint, linear programming, project management, time-cost trade-off, estimate, compression, penalty, project cost, completion time |
| Subjects: | quantity surveying, economics, algorithms, material properties and characteristics, project management theory and practice, project controls, regulatory law, profession, financial and cost management |
| Topics: | Legal Issues, Digital Applications, Time Control, Cost Management, Project Management, Construction Materials, Roles and Professions, Risk Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here