Rasdorf, W; Grasso, B and Bridgers, M (2010) Public versus private perceptions on hiring an external program manager. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(2), pp. 219-226. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
As construction industry service providers have expanded their service offerings to meet the demands of construction owners, new management techniques have evolved. One of these management techniques, program management, has emerged as a service offering that covers all aspects of the construction life cycle. This paper reviews specific topics related to the hiring of an external program management service provider, including fees, types of firms, factors considered, and organizational models. Each of these topics was addressed in a recent survey of nonresidential construction industry owners. The survey results are first presented for all respondents and are then segregated by sector (public and private sector respondents). It is apparent that the use of program management firms is still lacking in comparison to the use of other firms and service providers and that construction owners typically use an organizational model that allows them to retain control of their construction program, which true external program management does not. Also, the survey results showed differences between the public and private sectors in the factors considered when hiring a program manager. Because program management is the ultimate form of outsourcing, it is both a particularly timely topic and a topic that is very relevant to construction professionals.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | capital improvement; management; organizations; owners; surveys |
| Index terms: | outsourcing, life cycle, owner, private sector, construction professional, construction industry, manager, survey, program, management service |
| Subjects: | practitioner, value management, data collection methods, business, professional development, software systems, industry analysis, sociology |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Information Management, Project Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Procurement, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here