Thomas, M U (2010) Models for managing contingency construction operations. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(3), pp. 391-398. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
A contingency is a crisis situation such as a national disaster, civil disorder, or military invasion that creates a major threat to the safety and security of a population. Essentially all contingencies require construction support that is generally mission critical and inherently challenging due to the dynamics and uncertainty with the availability of resources and the demands for the projects. This paper considers a military contingency for which all construction projects must be completed within a fixed time to achieve mission success. The effectiveness in accomplishing the construction mission is based on mission time reliability assessed using the probability of interference between load measured in the number of days required for the project, and the capacity which is taken as the available allotted resources. Two models are developed to assist in managing the allocation of resources for the construction operations; one based on conditions of moderate risk with randomly occurring repetitive loads, and the other a Markov chain model for high risk conditions. Examples are provided.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction management; contingency construction; emergency services; man-made disasters; Markov process; military construction; reliability; security |
| Index terms: | Markov chain, construction operation, military construction, effectiveness, dynamics, construction project, population |
| Subjects: | demography, systems engineering, infrastructure and transport systems, performance management, production management, construction operations, mathematical modelling |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Urban Studies, Site Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here