Selecting infrastructure delivery modalities: No time for ideology or semantics

Vives, A; Benavides, J and Paris, A M (2010) Selecting infrastructure delivery modalities: No time for ideology or semantics. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(4), pp. 412-418. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Developing and developed countries need to increase their investments in infrastructure to support economic growth, productivity, and the competitiveness of their economies to enhance the well being of their populations. Some of these investments, being long term, illiquid and considered public services, tend to be undertaken by the public sector. Nevertheless, in some sectors and at different points in history, there has been considerable participation by the private sector. For the purposes of enhancing these investments, all possible options of private and public participation must be considered and the needs are such that ideology and semantics should not get in the way. From the very extensive experience in developing countries, it has been learned that selecting the proper modalities can enhance the long term viability of the investments, can increase the number of bankable projects, attract investments and reduce backlash from failures. These lessons can be applied to developed countries as well. This paper presents a model for the selection of the most suitable service delivery modalities adapted to the prevailing local conditions of the country.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: economic factors; financing; infrastructure; international development; investments; project delivery
Index terms: public participation, history, financing, well-being, population, developed country, infrastructure delivery, international development, developing country, developing and developed country, economic factor, economic growth, option, project delivery, competitiveness, productivity, public services, private sector, public sector, semantics, service delivery
Subjects: economic development, management, development economics, service delivery, economic concepts, decision analysis, market analysis, demography, industry analysis, administrative law, mental health and wellbeing, strategic management, economic analysis, project delivery, architectural and construction history, strategic project management, analytical methods, participation process
Topics: International Construction, Urban Studies, Legal Issues, Sustainability, Procurement, Risk Management, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Project Management, Health and Safety, Business Strategy
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here