Global dimension of robust project network design

Wong, K; Unsal, H; Taylor, J E and Levitt, R E (2010) Global dimension of robust project network design. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(4), pp. 442-451. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Managing the increased complexity, emerging uncertainties, and diversity of cultures on global projects is creating significant challenges for architecture, engineering, and construction firms. In global projects, differences in "institutions"-including language, beliefs, values, group norms, work practices, professional roles, industry organizations, and legal frameworks-among team members from different national backgrounds can lead to misunderstanding and conflicts that cause delays, increase costs, and reduce quality. Previous research has examined risk factors associated with international project execution. However, little research to date has explored whether reconfiguring project networks might mitigate such risks. Project organizational simulation tools have been combined with "robust design" experimental techniques to design robust project networks that can perform reliably in uncertain conditions. This paper extends project network design research to examine whether robust designs for given project networks differ between "domestic" and "global" projects, given differing organizational uncertainties. The results demonstrate that robust project network designs may differ for global project networks. This finding has significant implications for the design of project networks in an industry where firm participation in global project networks is increasing, both domestically and abroad.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: design; global; organizations; project management; project networks; robust design; simulation; uncertainty; uncertainty principles
Index terms: project management, complexity, work practice, norms, project network, dimension, construction firm, robust design, risk factor, international project, simulation tool
Subjects: sociology, analytical methods, project planning, systems engineering, strategic management, management, project management theory and practice, organization, design methods, environmental hazards, health monitoring assessment and metrics
Topics: Business Strategy, Organizational Design, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Project Management, Design Practice, International Construction, Engineering Principles, Sustainability
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here