Developing a fuzzy risk allocation model for PPP projects in China

Xu, Y; Chan, A P C and Yeung, J F Y (2010) Developing a fuzzy risk allocation model for PPP projects in China. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(8), pp. 894-903. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Equitable allocation of risks between the government and the private sector in concession agreement is essential to the success of public-private partnership (PPP) projects. The decision-making process, based on the established risk allocation principles expressed in linguistic terms, requires qualitative judgment and experiential knowledge of construction experts. However, it is subjective, partial, and implicit in actual application. This paper aims to develop a fuzzy synthetic evaluation model for determining an equitable risk allocation between the government and the private sector. By doing so, it assists the PPP project practitioners to transform the risk allocation principles in linguistic terms into a more usable and systematic quantitative-based analysis using fuzzy set. Twenty-three principles and influencing factors for risk allocation were identified through a comprehensive literature review. Nine critical risk allocation criteria (RACs) that evaluate the risk carrying capability of project participants were further identified, validated, and compiled based on the experts' knowledge via face-to-face interviews. On the other hand, the weighting for each critical risk allocation criterion was determined through a two-round Delphi questionnaire survey. A set of knowledge-based fuzzy inference rules was then established to set up the membership function for the nine RACs. Based on the research findings, a fuzzy synthetic evaluation model was finally established to determine an equitable risk allocation between the government and the private sector.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: China; fuzzy set; fuzzy sets; fuzzy synthetic evaluation; governments; PPP projects; private sector; quantitative risk allocation; risk management
Index terms: risk allocation, risk management, fuzzy set, decision-making process, private sector, partnership, judgment, influencing factor, China, practitioner, questionnaire, survey, literature review, face, fuzzy inference, fuzzy synthetic evaluation, interview
Subjects: data analysis and analytics, psychology, practitioner, dispute resolution, data collection methods, risk assessment, decision-making and optimization, industry analysis, partnership management, decision analysis, Geography, financial risk
Topics: Organizational Design, Legal Issues, Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Business Strategy, Cost Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here