Yang, J; Shen, G Q; Drew, D S and Ho, M (2010) Critical success factors for stakeholder management: Construction practitioners' perspectives. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(7), pp. 778-786. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Although various factors have been identified as important for accomplishing successful stakeholder management, few studies appear to have undertaken a comparative analysis of practitioners' views on the relative importance of critical success factors (CSFs) for stakeholder management in construction projects. In an attempt to fill this research gap, a questionnaire survey was conducted in Hong Kong to collect the opinions of construction practitioners regarding the relative importance of CSFs for stakeholder management. Findings from this study show that all 15 selected CSFs are regarded as critical by most respondents for the success of stakeholder management in construction projects. The factor regarding social responsibilities is considered most important for managing stakeholders. Although correlations between CSFs and types of projects and organizations were statistically significant, these were not particularly strong. Also, even though there is a general consensus on the rankings of the CSFs among different respondents, the detailed pairwise comparisons actually show the existence of a few differences in perceptions on the relative importance of the CSFs. Therefore, the working priorities of project managers for managing stakeholders are context specific, depending on the nature, client sector, and cost of the project, and also on their organizations and management levels in the organization. These findings should help project managers become more aware of their responsibilities and the relative importance of issues for management stakeholders.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | comparative analysis; critical success factors; Hong Kong; stakeholder management |
| Index terms: | stakeholder management, social responsibility, critical success factor, construction project, questionnaire, practitioner, construction practitioner, survey, comparative analysis, relative importance, Hong Kong, project manager |
| Subjects: | profession, risk assessment, data collection methods, practitioner, control systems, data analysis and analytics, participation process, professional development, Geography, health safety and environment, production management |
| Topics: | Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Health and Safety, Geographical Context, Project Management, Research Practice, Information Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here