Sumner, S and Farrell, P (2003) The influence of clients on health and safety standards in construction. In: Greenwood, D J (ed.) Proceedings of 19th Annual ARCOM Conference, 3-5 September 2003, Brighton, UK.
Abstract
The aim of this study is to investigate the contribution made by clients to health and safety standards in construction. It is argued that problems arise in this area because there are an increasing number of projects procured on a without quantities basis. The assessment of the work involved is therefore more difficult, and contractors are not able to establish their risks easily. It is also argued that risks to clients are increased as they will not be able to judge the validity of the tenders on a 'like for like' basis. The approach taken by clients to assess contractors' provision of resources for health and safety is inconsistent. Contractors may be appointed that have not fully considered the health and safety aspects of projects, and may not have included sufficient funds in their tender bids to complete the project safely. The key objective is to determine the influence of clients' use of health and safety criteria at tender stage on standards of health and safety during the construction phase. The main research instrument is a postal questionnaire survey, which collates quantitative data. The population for the study is practising construction clients in the commercial sector. The reliability and validity of the study are considered. Inferential statistical techniques are used to test the hypothesis. Two main conclusions are given: (1) construction clients should state that heath and safety is a key criteria to be considered in judgements about a contractor’s performance, and (2) standards of health and safety could be improved by educating clients. Recommendations include further investigation to establish who is best placed to advise clients on matters of health and safety and a further study to assess the relationship between contractors' health and safety performance and their overall project performance.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | client; contractor selection; health and safety; tendering |
| Index terms: | construction phase, population, tender stage, investigation, questionnaire, project performance, construction client, validity, survey, contractor selection, health and safety |
| Subjects: | project delivery, practitioner, data collection methods, evaluation and assessment methods, demography, health safety and environment, project management theory and practice, tendering |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Project Management, Health and Safety, Procurement, Roles and Professions, Urban Studies |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here