Understanding and improving your risk management capability: Assessment model for construction organizations

Zou, P X W; Chen, Y and Chan, T Y (2010) Understanding and improving your risk management capability: Assessment model for construction organizations. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(8), pp. 854-863. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Implementing risk management in construction projects and organizations may bring a number of benefits and therefore it is necessary to have risk management as an integral part of a construction organization's management practice. The aim of this paper is to develop a risk management maturity assessment model for construction organizations. The paper describes the development process of a Web-based RM3 (risk management maturity model), including its contents, its validation and testing, as well as its applications. The RM3 developed has five attributes namely, management, risk culture, ability to identify risk, ability to analyze risk, and application of standardized risk management process/system. These attributes are measured against four levels: initial, repeated, managed, and optimized. It is found that the proposed RM3 was suitable and useful. Using the RM3, it is found that the Australian construction industry's overall risk management maturity level was relatively low (where 32% rated at Level 2 and 52% rated at Level 3). Furthermore, it is found that the weakest attribute was "analyzing risks" followed by "application of standardized risk management process." It is therefore necessary to provide more training on qualitative and quantitative risk analysis to construction personnel and to develop and apply standardized enterprise risk management. It is concluded that the proposed RM3 is suitable for construction organizations to assess their risk management maturity levels and find ways for improvement.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: capability; construction companies; construction organization; construction project; maturity assessment models; maturity level; risk management
Index terms: validation, construction project, risk culture, management practice, construction company, construction personnel, testing, construction industry, risk management, quantitative risk analysis, enterprise risk management, maturity model, maturity level, construction organization
Subjects: management, production management, financial risk, evaluation, professional development, industry analysis, environmental hazards, workforce, risk assessment, organization, professional practice
Topics: Project Management, Research Practice, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Sustainability, Risk Management, Human Resources
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here