Risk planning and management for the Panama Canal expansion program

Alarcón, L F; Ashley, D B; De Hanily, A S; Molenaar, K R and Ungo, R (2011) Risk planning and management for the Panama Canal expansion program. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 137(10), pp. 762-771. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

In April 2006, the Panama Canal Authority formally proposed a major expansion of the canal to increase its capacity and make it more productive, safe, and efficient. This proposal included cost and schedule estimates for completing the expansion and was supported overwhelmingly by the citizens of Panama in an October 2006 public referendum. Given the conceptual level of design at the time of the proposal and the inherent uncertainty in a project of this magnitude at the early stages of engineering, a comprehensive risk analysis was performed to develop a contingency model for the total expansion program cost and schedule. This contingency model is based on a Monte Carlo simulation of the cost and schedule estimates, taking into account the most significant risks identified for the project. The resulting model provides contingency assessments for duration and total cost and sensitivity analysis of the risks; it also allows for multiple scenario planning and ultimately supports overall risk management. This paper presents a project case study that focuses on the contingency model development and the resulting risk management and contingency resolution processes.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: canals; construction costs; cost estimates; risk analysis; risk management; scheduling; uncertainty analysis
Index terms: duration, model development, resolution, risk management, canal, estimate, uncertainty analysis, program, construction cost, scheduling, sensitivity analysis, case study, Monte Carlo simulation, cost estimate, Panama, proposal, risk analysis, scenario planning
Subjects: financial and cost management, analytical methods, operations research, Geography, management, project planning, infrastructure and transport systems, risk assessment, conflict resolution, environmental hazards, project controls, data collection methods, software systems, modelling and simulation
Topics: Risk Management, Sustainability, Geographical Context, Time Control, Business Strategy, Digital Applications, Cost Management, Stakeholder Management, Project Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here