Optimization of project time-cost trade-off problem with discounted cash flows

Ammar, M A (2011) Optimization of project time-cost trade-off problem with discounted cash flows. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 137(1), pp. 65-71. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Traditional time-cost trade-off (TCTO) analysis assumes constant value of activities' cost along the project time span. However, the value of money decreases with time and, therefore, discounted cash flows should be considered when solving TCTO optimization problem. Optimization problems in project management have been traditionally solved by two distinctive approaches: heuristic methods and optimization techniques. Although heuristic methods can handle large-size projects, they do not guarantee optimal solutions. A nonlinear mathematical optimization model for project TCTO problem is developed, which minimizes project direct cost and takes into account discounted cash flows. Costs of activities are assumed to be incurred at their finish times. The model guarantees the optimal solution, in which precise discrete activity time-cost function is used. The model input includes precedence relationship between project activities, discrete utility data for project activities, and discount rate. Details of model formulation are illustrated by an example project. The results show that selected activities' durations and costs and consequently optimal project duration differ from traditional analysis if discounted cash flow is considered. The new approach provides project practitioners with a way for considering net present value in time-cost decisions so that the best option can be identified.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: discounted cash flows; net present value; nonlinear programming; optimization; project management; time-cost trade-off
Index terms: optimization technique, direct cost, heuristic, net present value, duration, option, time-cost trade-off, project management, guarantee, discounted cash flow, practitioner, programming, precedence relationship
Subjects: decision analysis, project controls, financial analysis, algorithms, economics, contract structure, quantity surveying, project management theory and practice, operations research, economic analysis, risk assessment, practitioner, programming
Topics: Project Management, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Procurement, Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Digital Applications, Time Control
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here