Probabilistic estimation and allocation of project time contingency

Barraza, G A (2011) Probabilistic estimation and allocation of project time contingency. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 137(4), pp. 259-265. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Project managers implement the concept of time contingency to consider uncertainty in duration estimates and prevent project completion delays. Some project managers also build a distribution of the project time contingency into the project activities to create a more manageable schedule. Generally, both the estimation and distribution of the project time contingency are conducted by using subjective approaches. Because the project schedule feasibility mainly depends on the variable behavior of the project activities, the estimate of project time contingency and its allocation at the activity level should be obtained by considering the performance variability of each activity rather than basing on human judgment. In this paper, the stochastic allocation of project allowances method, which is based on MonteCarlo simulation, is proposed to estimate the project time contingency and allocate it among the project activities. The application of this method to a three-span bridge project results in a fair allocation of the project time contingency and provides practical means to control time contingencies at the activity level.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: contingency; montecarlo method; project management; scheduling; simulation
Index terms: variability, scheduling, judgment, project manager, bridge project, estimate, estimation, duration, project management
Subjects: dispute resolution, project management theory and practice, project controls, infrastructure and transport systems, statistical analysis, operations research, profession, financial and cost management
Topics: Legal Issues, Time Control, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Roles and Professions, Project Management, Cost Management
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here