Why we need renaissance engineers: Golden Gate bridge seismic retrofit Phase II case study

Bauer, E and Menches, C L (2011) Why we need renaissance engineers: Golden Gate bridge seismic retrofit Phase II case study. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 137(10), pp. 901-905. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

In today's world of specialization, civil engineers may benefit from a return to an earlier period when breadth of knowledge, skills, and attitudes were appreciated: the Renaissance era. A broad set of skills is especially important in meeting the challenges of restoring deteriorating infrastructure and working with restricted financing. This paper presents the case of the Golden Gate Bridge Seismic Retrofit Phase II Project to illustrate how important it is for civil engineers to possess solid technical expertise coupled with a cross-disciplinary knowledge of design and construction to achieve project success. These qualities allowed the engineers to integrate construction knowledge into the design process and design knowledge into the construction process, in spite of the project's traditional design-bid-build delivery method. Of equal importance to the success were the engineers' commitment, integrity, and persistence. The Phase II Project involved modifying the 70-year-old bridge's five south approach structures. By applying modern earthquake engineering standards, these structures are now capable of withstanding a seismic event comparable to the Great San Francisco Earthquake of 1906. The final outcome was a complex yet cost-efficient seismic upgrade of the iconic Golden Gate Bridge, a project that was constructed within budget and without claims. In 2007, the project received the American Society of Civil Engineers' Outstanding Civil Engineering Award.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: complexity; design; multidisciplinary; retrofit
Index terms: complexity, financing, construction process, commitment, civil engineer, specialization, society, design process, earthquake, design and construction, engineer, integrity, delivery method, design-bid-build, case study, project success
Subjects: project management theory and practice, health safety and environment, environmental hazards, systems engineering, communities and social development, building construction, delivery method, design methods, business, data collection methods, profession, economic analysis, contractual arrangements, psychology
Topics: Design Practice, Site Management, Organizational Design, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Research Practice, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Sustainability, Procurement
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here