Bittner, R B and Schmitt, R L (2011) Construction engineering process and knowledge requirements for fostering creative design solutions on infrastructure projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 137(10): 0000303, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Construction engineering for major infrastructure projects covers a wide range of activities to evaluate and select the techniques for assembling materials and components. Construction engineering inherently presents a very challenging opportunity for creative design, particularly on infrastructure projects. This construction engineering activity can be described as one of creating and developing workable, cost-effective, low-risk technical solutions for an array of infrastructure construction problems that must be solved from the plans and specifications stage through facility completion. The purpose of this paper is to illustrate a 10-step construction engineering process and define important knowledge requirements to foster creative design solutions using four case studies, including (1) positioning and holding a concrete bridge caisson in a 7-knot tidal current for a 4-month period; (2)skidding a 55,000-t immersed tube tunnel element 200m on dry land from casting site to launch site; (3)building a major dam without the use of river diversion or on-site dewatering systems; and (4)building underwater bridge piers without the use of conventional bottom-founded cofferdams. The creative design process was able to successfully devise a plan for solving highly technical construction challenges using a process-based approach. The key requirements of knowledge, skill, and experience necessary to perform these activities are presented to assist construction engineers in preparing for these creative opportunities.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | case study; construction engineering; design; knowledge; process approach |
| Index terms: | tunnel, infrastructure construction, case study, construction engineering, specification, infrastructure project, design process, cofferdam, land, tube, engineer, concrete bridge, caisson |
| Subjects: | design methods, structural engineering, civil engineering, data collection methods, materials science, geotechnical engineering, contractual condition, engineering methods, real estate economics, infrastructure and transport systems, profession |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Research Practice, Contract Administration, Urban Studies, Engineering Principles, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here