Goodrum, P M; Haas, C T; Caldas, C; Zhai, D; Yeiser, J and Homm, D (2011) Model to predict the impact of a technology on construction productivity. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 137(9), pp. 678-688. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Although some new technologies promise to improve construction productivity, their ability to deliver is not always realized. Building on a great deal of prior research, a four-stage predictive model was developed and validated to estimate the potential for a technology to have a positive impact on construction productivity. The four stages examine the costs, feasibility, usage history, and technical impact of a technology. The predictive model combines results from historical analyses to formalize how selected technologies with improved construction productivity can be used as a predictor of how future technologies might do the same. Each of the stages of a predictive model was subdivided into a series of categories and questions, which were weighted by importance by using the analytic hierarchy process and historical analysis to generate a performance score for the analyzed technology. The predictive model was then validated by using 74 previous and existing construction technologies. Statistical analysis confirmed that average performance scores produced by the model were significantly different across the categories of successful, inconclusive, and unsuccessful in the actual implementation experience of technologies.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction productivity; predictive model; technology; validation |
| Index terms: | construction productivity, construction technology, new technology, statistical analysis, validation, history, implementation, estimate |
| Subjects: | data science, architectural and construction history, digital engineering, professional development, contractual arrangements, operations management, financial and cost management, innovation and technology management |
| Topics: | Information Management, Project Management, Cost Management, Procurement, Digital Applications, Engineering Principles, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here