Hariga, M and El-Sayegh, S M (2011) Cost optimization model for the multiresource leveling problem with allowed activity splitting. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 137(1), pp. 56-64. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Resource leveling aims at minimizing the resource usage fluctuations, which is accomplished by moving noncritical activities within their float. The project duration is fixed and is not affected by the leveling. Most of resource leveling techniques assumes that activities cannot be split. Although this assumption is valid for most construction activities, there are several activities that can be split to achieve better resource leveling. However, there is an added cost associated with splitting such as startup and restarting costs. This paper presents an optimization model for resource leveling that allows activity splitting and minimizes its associated costs. The objective is to level resources in a way that provides a tradeoff between the extra cost of acquiring and releasing resources versus the extra cost of activity splitting. The model can be used to determine at what values of the splitting cost, the preemption of an activity is recommended. One example problem is solved at the end of the paper in order to illustrate the proposed model.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | analytical techniques; leveling; optimization models; splitting |
| Index terms: | resource levelling technique, construction activity, resource levelling, duration, tradeoff, cost optimization, startup |
| Subjects: | economics, project controls, construction operations, decision analysis, business, resource management |
| Topics: | Site Management, Time Control, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Risk Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here