Hashemi, H; Mousavi, S M and Mojtahedi, S M H (2011) Bootstrap technique for risk analysis with interval numbers in bridge construction projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 137(8), pp. 600-608. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Bridges are principal and vital transportation structures. If risk management is not considered in bridge construction projects, objectives cannot be delivered on time, on budget, or with suitable quality results. Risk data set sizes and experts' judgments are not usually sufficient for analyzing significant risks in bridge construction projects; moreover, the statistical distributions for risk parameter estimates are usually unknown. Standard parametric statistical techniques cannot provide appropriate solutions for cases with small data sets or unknown distributions. This paper proposes a new hybrid approach by using a nonparametric resampling technique and interval computations for risk analysis, in particular, for bridge construction projects. Bootstrap techniques produce more accurate inferences for comparing parametric techniques and are an alternative when the underlying parametric assumptions are not considered. Increasingly, because of the complexity and uncertainty in decision making at bridge projects, it is easier or more natural to provide interval values for parts or all of decision-making judgments. Furthermore, the goal of reducing standard deviations for both risk probability and risk impact compared with the conventional approach is another conclusion of this paper. The proposed approach is applied to a case in Iran to show the validity of the approach.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | bootstrap technique; bridge construction projects; bridges; interval risk score; non-parametric statistics; risk management; statistics |
| Index terms: | risk impact, decision-making, computation, risk analysis, bridge construction, complexity, judgment, deviation, validity, risk management, statistics, bridge project, estimate |
| Subjects: | evaluation and assessment methods, risk assessment, mathematical modelling, computational methods, dispute resolution, financial and cost management, infrastructure engineering, decision analysis, infrastructure and transport systems, environmental hazards, systems engineering |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Cost Management, Sustainability, Risk Management, Digital Applications, Legal Issues |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here