Research in visualization techniques for field construction

Kamat, V R; Martinez, J C; Fischer, M; Golparvar-Fard, M; Pea-Mora, F and Savarese, S (2011) Research in visualization techniques for field construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 137, pp. 853-862. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Field construction can be planned, monitored, and controlled at two distinct levels: (1)the activity or schedule level; and (2)the operation or process level. Graphical three-dimensional (3D) visualization can serve as an effective communication method at both levels. Many research efforts in visualizing construction are rooted in scheduling. They typically involve linking activity-based construction schedules and 3D computer-aided design (CAD) models of facilities to describe discretely evolving construction product visualizations (often referred to as four-dimensional CAD). The focus is on communicating what components are built where and when, with the intention of studying the optimal activity sequence, spatial, and temporal interferences. The construction processes or operations actually involved in building the components are usually implied. A second approach in visualizing construction is rooted in discrete-event simulation that, in addition to visualizing evolving construction products, also concerns the visualization of the operations and processes that are performed in building them. In addition to what is built where and when, the approach communicates who builds it and how by depicting the interaction between involved machines, resources, and materials. This paper introduces the two approaches and describes the differences in concept, form, and content between activity level and operations level construction visualization. An example of a structural steel framing operation is presented to elucidate the comparison. This work was originally published in the proceedings of the 2002 IEEE Winter Simulation Conference. This paper expands on the original work by describing recent advances in both activity and operations level construction visualization.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: 4D CAD; augmented reality; simulation; visualization
Index terms: winter, scheduling, framing, construction process, activity sequence, augmented reality, computer aided design, visualization, construction product, conference, communication method, interaction
Subjects: conceptual models, economic analysis, operations research, visualization, climate science, computational design, research dissemination and communication, behavioral psychology, building construction, professional development, design practice
Topics: Sustainability, Business Strategy, Information Management, Research Practice, Site Management, Time Control, Digital Applications, Design Practice
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here