Combination of project cost forecasts in earned value management

Kim, B C and Reinschmidt, K F (2011) Combination of project cost forecasts in earned value management. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 137(11), pp. 958-966. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Reliable cost estimates are essential for effective project control and the management of cash flows within the project and at the company level. Conventional approaches to project cost forecasting, which rely on detailed information developed for a specific project (the bottom-up estimate or inside view), often result in cost overruns. It is argued here that the inside-view project cost estimates should be adjusted by combining them with the outside (or top-down) view of the project, which is based on statistical models of historical project data. This paper presents a probabilistic cost forecasting method and a framework for an adaptive combination of the inside view and the outside view forecasts of project cost using Bayesian inference and the Bayesian model averaging technique. During the project execution phase, the Bayesian adaptive forecasting method incorporates into the predictions the actual performance data from earned value management and revises preproject cost estimates, making full use of the available information. Qualitative examples are presented to demonstrate the validity of the proposed method as a tool for effective project cost prediction and control.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: cost; earned value management; forecasting; project controls
Index terms: cost overrun, validity, forecasting, project control, cost forecasting, earned value management, estimate, project cost, project data, statistical model, cost estimate, cash flow
Subjects: economics, data collection methods, financial management, evaluation and assessment methods, data science, financial and cost management, control systems, prediction and forecasting
Topics: Research Practice, Project Management, Cost Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here