Kim, H J and Reinschmidt, K F (2011) Effects of contractors' risk attitude on competition in construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 137(4), pp. 275-283. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Competitive bidding is the major mechanism of competition. Bidding is risky because the actual cost of the job is unknown. Thus, the bid should be high enough to make a profit but low enough to win the bidding. The result of competition depends on the competitor's risk-taking behaviors, which are affected by the organization's risk attitudes. A contractor's risk-taking is an essential element of the construction business. The current study explores the domain of competition at the aggregate market level. An evolutionary simulation model was developed to investigate the effects of risk attitude on a contractor's success and on the market structure. The analysis accounts for different risk-taking behaviors in competition, different performances by contractors, corresponding organizational changes, and aggregate patterns in the form of the market structure. The study finds that risk attitude is a competitive characteristic of contractors. The results provide new insight on competition in the market place, and explanations are given for a contractor's competitive success.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | bids; competition; competitive bidding; competitive success; contractors; enr top 400 contractors; evolutionary approach; market structure; organizational risk attitude; organizations; risk management |
| Index terms: | profit, actual cost, competitive bidding, risk attitude, organizational change, risk taking, bidding, competition, aggregate, risk management |
| Subjects: | materials science, business, risk assessment, financial and cost management, economic analysis, bidding, decision-making and reasoning, market analysis |
| Topics: | Risk Management, Procurement, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here