Empirical analysis of the determinants of organizational flexibility in the construction business

Lim, B T H; Ling, F Y Y; Ibbs, C W; Raphael, B and Ofori, G (2011) Empirical analysis of the determinants of organizational flexibility in the construction business. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 137(3), pp. 225-237. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Flexibility has been touted as an important requirement for firms to survive and prosper in turbulent and volatile economic environments. The aim of this research is to investigate the relevance of organizational flexibility management to construction firms, because firms that are more flexible are more likely to survive and prosper than less flexible firms. More specifically, the objectives are to define a model that will allow contractors to understand the complex factors that contribute to organizational flexibility; ascertain whether organizational flexibility should be treated as a uni- or multidimensional construct; and identify the key determinants that drive organizational flexibility. A two-pronged research method with exploratory interviews and an industrywide survey was adopted. Data were collected from face-to-face interviews with construction industry experts. The data collection instrument for the survey was a structured questionnaire specifically designed for this study. By using structural equation modeling, the study empirically investigated the key dimensions and determinants of organizational flexibility. The results showed that organizational flexibility should be treated as a multidimensional concept, comprising operational flexibility, tactical flexibility, and strategic flexibility. The key determinants-employees' skills and behavior, supply chain capabilities, and business strategies-were found to have the highest positive impacts on operational flexibility, tactical flexibility, and strategic flexibility, respectively. The structural equation model developed from this research provides guidance to practitioners on the organizational attributes that they could improve to achieve organizational flexibility, which would help them to survive and grow.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: business strategies; construction firms; flexibility; operational flexibility; supply chain; tactical flexibility and strategic flexibility
Index terms: practitioner, questionnaire, construction firm, survey, business strategy, face, structural equation modelling, interview, construction industry, determinant, dimension, structural equation model
Subjects: industry analysis, statistical analysis, practitioner, data collection methods, risk assessment, business, organization, health monitoring assessment and metrics, psychology
Topics: Organizational Design, Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here