Dynamics of rework in complex offshore hydrocarbon projects

Love, P E D; Edwards, D J; Irani, Z and Goh, Y M (2011) Dynamics of rework in complex offshore hydrocarbon projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 137(12), pp. 1060-1070. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Little systematic knowledge is available on the dynamics of rework in complex hydrocarbon (oil and gas) projects, despite the fact that they frequently exceed budget and schedule projections by more than 10%. To better understand pertinent issues associated with rework, twenty three in-depth interviews were undertaken with personnel from a major international oil and gas operator. The interviews sought to elicit deep individualistic knowledge about the dynamics of design changes, errors, and omissions that contributed to rework in four off-shore projects that they were involved with. Akin to previous research, the factors of poorly defined scope, unrealistic schedules, design changes, and coordination problems were identified as contributors to rework. A significant difference from previous studies, however, was that rework was expected and considered a norm. The issue at hand therefore related to when and where' rework would materialize, because it was considered that the implementation of front end loading, audits, and reviews would capture any design flaws that may have materialized. The potential revenue that could be generated from earlier extraction and production of oil and gas outweighed any rework costs that were likely to be incurred. A systemic model representing the underlying conditions that contributed to rework was developed from the findings to provide managers with the necessary insights about the interdependencies and behavior between key variables. The developed model can be used to identify future areas in which rework prevention and mitigation strategies should focus on in future projects.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: causal modelling; complexity; learning; off-shore structures; project; rework
Index terms: mitigation, complexity, manager, interview, personnel, rework, design change, strategy, revenue, dynamics, prevention, implementation, modelling, loading, oil and gas, coordination, audit
Subjects: systems engineering, industry analysis, financial risk, management, performance measurement, analytical methods, economic analysis, construction operations, contractual arrangements, operations management, practitioner, data collection methods
Topics: Engineering Principles, Project Management, Research Practice, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Procurement, Roles and Professions, Human Resources, Quality Management, Site Management, Organizational Design
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here