Manrique, J D; Al-Hussein, M; Bouferguene, A; Safouhi, H and Nasseri, R (2011) Combinatorial algorithm for optimizing wood waste in framing designs. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 137(3), pp. 188-197. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
As a result of elevated labor costs, a shortage of trades personnel, and a lack of efficient construction methods, many construction companies in western Canada waste primary materials. In general, these firms suffer from a lack of effective construction guidelines and process standardizations. This paper focuses on the use of a mathematical algorithm, referred to here in this paper as CUTEX, which maximizes the use of wood materials for platform-framing residential construction. In particular, CUTEX is designed to reduce waste by generating a cutting list for wood studs and sheathing (oriented strand boards-OSB). A combinatorial analysis algorithm has been developed and applied to determine the best cutting procedure for wood stick frame houses. Restrictions, such as nominal lumber dimensions and sizes encountered in the North American market, were taken into account. A two-dimensional optimization for sheathing layout has also been developed to minimize the disposal of OSB boards, making the construction process leaner and more economical. A direct and positive impact on the environment and a reduction in construction costs are expected as a result of reducing the amount of primary materials utilized.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | algorithm optimization; automation; computer models; computer-aided drafting; construction materials; cutoffs; frame design |
| Index terms: | construction method, framing, construction company, personnel, construction process, construction cost, wood, Canada, platform, dimension, automation, construction material, labour cost, drafting, standardization, residential construction |
| Subjects: | digital design, Geography, automation and robotics, traditional and composite building materials, construction integration, performance measurement, management, cost management, building construction, organization, health monitoring assessment and metrics, financial and cost management, conceptual models, technical documentation, building materials |
| Topics: | Geographical Context, Research Practice, Construction Materials, Engineering Principles, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Procurement, Human Resources, Quality Management, Design Practice, Digital Applications, Site Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here