Mitropoulos, P and Namboodiri, M (2011) New method for measuring the safety risk of construction activities: Task demand assessment. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 137(1), pp. 30-38. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
The task demand assessment (TDA) is a new technique for measuring the safety risk of construction activities and analyzing how changes in operation parameters can affect the potential for accidents. TDA is similar to observational ergonomic methods-it does not produce estimates of probabilities of incidents, but it quantifies the "task demand" of actual operations based on characteristics of the activity and independent of the workers' capabilities. The task demand reflects the difficulty to perform the activity safely. It is based on (1) the exposure to a hazard and (2) the presence and level of observable task demand factors-that is, risk factors that can increase the potential for an accident. The paper presents the findings from the initial implementation of TDA and demonstrates its feasibility and applicability on two different operations: a roofing activity and a concrete paving operation. Furthermore, the paving case illustrates how the TDA method can compare different production scenarios and measure the effect of production variables on the accident potential. The findings indicate that the method can be applied on activities of varying complexity and can account for several risks and task demand factors as required by the user. The selection of task demand factors is a key issue for the validity of the method and requires input from the crew and safety management. The limitations of the methodology and the need for further research are discussed. Overall, TDA provides a tool that can assist researchers and practitioners in the analysis and design of construction operations.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction safety; risk assessment methodology; safety risk assessment; task demands |
| Index terms: | construction operation, validity, construction activity, implementation, estimate, risk factor, presence, risk assessment, paving, complexity, construction safety, safety management, exposure, practitioner, methodology, roofing |
| Subjects: | practitioner, evaluation and assessment methods, financial and cost management, construction operations, environmental science, contractual arrangements, financial risk, research methods, public and environmental health, design practice, systems engineering, transportation engineering, environmental hazards, environmental health, occupational health and safety management |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Procurement, Sustainability, Cost Management, Health and Safety, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Site Management, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here