Nagashima, M; Tsuchiya, M and Asada, M (2011) Reducing the economic risk of lng tank construction under conditions of fluctuating resource prices. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 137(5), pp. 382-391. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Fluctuating resource prices affect the costs of the materials used in the construction of LNG (liquid natural gas) tanks. In this paper, methods based on the field experience of the writers for the reduction of the cost of LNG tanks in general and in-ground LNG tanks in particular are discussed. Of the various components of the construction cost, the price of steel materials is a significant contributor. Using a newly defined cost impact index, the costs of construction of different types of LNG tanks are compared. Further, by considering actual examples of the construction of in-ground tanks, important issues relating to the use of steel materials are identified and, by using a cost reduction index, recommendations are made for the reduction of the cost risk during fluctuations in resource prices.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | cost fluctuation risk management; liquid natural gas; optimization of construction costs; resources price; underground storage tanks |
| Index terms: | risk management, cost reduction, construction cost |
| Subjects: | financial and cost management, economics, risk assessment |
| Topics: | Cost Management, Risk Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here