Said, H and El-Rayes, K (2011) Optimizing material procurement and storage on construction sites. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 137(6), pp. 421-431. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Efficient planning of materials procurement and storage on construction sites can lead to significant improvements in construction productivity and project profitability. Existing research studies focus on material procurement and storage layout as two separate planning tasks without considering their critical and mutual interdependencies. This paper presents the development of a new optimization model for construction logistics planning that is capable of simultaneously integrating and optimizing the critical planning decisions of material procurement and material storage on construction sites. The model utilizes genetic algorithms to minimize construction logistics costs that cover material ordering, financing, stock-out, and layout costs. The model incorporates newly developed algorithms to estimate the impact of potential material shortages on-site because of late delivery on project delays and stock-out costs. An application example is analyzed to demonstrate the capabilities of the construction logistics planning model in simultaneously optimizing material procurement decisions and storage layout plans.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | dynamic layout planning; genetic algorithms; inventory control; materials procurement; optimization |
| Index terms: | material procurement, estimate, construction productivity, construction site, shortages, project delay, genetic algorithm, construction logistics, profitability, inventory, financing |
| Subjects: | financial and cost management, algorithms, contractual arrangements, economic analysis, operations management, inventory management, project controls, construction logistics, work location |
| Topics: | Project Management, Site Management, Research Practice, Digital Applications, Cost Management, Time Control, Business Strategy, Supply Chain Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here