Windmill erection and maintenance: Challenges for crane design

Sanders, S A and Shapira, A (2011) Windmill erection and maintenance: Challenges for crane design. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 137, pp. 777-784. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

The wide range of crane types and sizes offered by the market expresses the responsiveness of the lifting industry to meet the variety of challenges posed by the built environment. One such emerging set of challenges is the outcome of the growing rate of wind turbine installation. Wind energy is one of the largest alternative energy production methods today, and as the global push for greener energy sources is increasing, so is the number of windmills. This paper addresses the unique lifting challenges posed by windmill installation and maintenance. These challenges have been met by leading crane manufacturers in various ways to produce products not seen before on the construction scene. The paper focuses on two such products representing two different concepts and provides the development and design rational of each. Engineering is impacted by unique height, lifting capacity, site preparation, and environmental requirements. The accelerated rate of global wind energy use, the increasing number, height, and component weight of turbine towers, and the persistent search for new territories for wind farms are likely to further produce more innovative solutions.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: cranes; lifting requirements; wind industry; windmill
Index terms: built environment, lifting, alternative energy, energy use, energy source, wind turbine installation, manufacturer
Subjects: infrastructure and transport systems, energy systems, occupational health and safety management, practitioner
Topics: Health and Safety, Sustainability, Roles and Professions, Engineering Principles, Urban Studies
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here