Key assessment indicators for the sustainability of infrastructure projects

Shen, L; Wu, Y and Zhang, X (2011) Key assessment indicators for the sustainability of infrastructure projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 137(6), pp. 441-451. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Infrastructure projects have major effects on implementing the principles of sustainable development. Infrastructure projects will continue to be developed in the coming years, particularly in developing countries such as China and India; therefore, it is important to find methods and solutions for improving the sustainability of them. Although existing studies have suggested various methods for practicing sustainable development principles in the process of implementing infrastructure projects, effective assessment indicators are unavailable, which presents a barrier to the effective assessment of infrastructure project sustainability. This study introduces key assessment indicators (KAIs) for assessing the sustainability performance of an infrastructure project. The research data used for analysis were collected from a questionnaire survey given to three groups of experts, including government officials, professionals, and clients in the Chinese construction industry. The fuzzy set theory was used to establish KAIs. A procedure for using the KAIs is demonstrated by a case study. These research findings provide an alternative solution to appraise the sustainability of infrastructure projects.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: China; infrastructure; project management; sustainable development
Index terms: questionnaire, China, developing country, sustainable development, survey, infrastructure project, India, construction industry, project management, case study, fuzzy set theory, sustainability performance
Subjects: decision-making and optimization, industry analysis, infrastructure and transport systems, development economics, project management theory and practice, health safety and environment, Geography, sustainability assessment, data collection methods
Topics: Research Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Health and Safety, Sustainability, International Construction
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here