Unsal, H I and Taylor, J E (2011) Absorptive capacity of project networks. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 137(11), pp. 994-1002. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Absorptive capacity is a firm's ability to value, assimilate, and utilize new external knowledge and apply it to commercial ends. Much of the prior research on absorptive capacity focuses on characterizing the factors that influence absorptive capacity within organizations. However, the mechanism of how related factors affect absorptive capacity across interdependent organizations in project networks remains less explored. This paper extends a simulation model of project network learning to explore the absorptive capacity of project networks where periodic external innovations exist. This model is utilized in a series of simulation experiments to untangle the effects of varying types of innovation and degrees of relational instability in a project network. We establish a measure of project network absorptive capacity and develop an argument that relational instability moderates the project network's absorptive capacity for different types of innovation. These findings have significant implications for assessing and developing strategies to improve a project organizational network's capacity to absorb and, hence, profit from innovation.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | absorptive capacity; innovation; learning; organizational issues; productivity; project networks |
| Index terms: | organizational issue, productivity, simulation experiment, profit, strategy, absorptive capacity, project network |
| Subjects: | management, theoretical framing, project planning, economic analysis, modelling and simulation, business |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Project Management, Research Practice, Organizational Design, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 CTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here