Wibowo, A and Kochendoerfer, B (2011) Selecting BOT/PPP infrastructure projects for government guarantee portfolio under conditions of budget and risk in the Indonesian context. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 137(7), pp. 512-522. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Guarantee provision in privately financed infrastructure projects implemented as build-operate-transfer/public-private-partnership (BOT/PPP) arrangements is not uncommon in many countries, and Indonesia is no exception. But, given that the government budget is, in most if not all cases, not unlimited, there must be a selection of BOT/PPP projects posing proposals for seeking government guarantees. This paper presents a project selection methodology under the chance-constrained goal-programming framework in the context of the Indonesian BOT/PPP infrastructure industry. The ultimate objective of the selection is to result in a portfolio of guaranteed projects that brings maximum welfare gain to the economy as a whole, maximum total net change in financial net present value but, at the same time, puts the government at the lowest fiscal risk for a given budget constraint. The proposed methodology allows the government to examine relationships among the expected total payment, budget-at-risk allocated, and a desired confidence interval of actual payment not exceeding the budget-at-risk. The government can also compare two or more alternative scenarios and choose the optimal one that delivers the highest value for the money. To illustrate the model application, without sacrificing the generality of the proposed methodology, a much-simplified hypothetical case is presented, examined, and discussed.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | budget-at-risk; build/operate/transfer; chance-constrained goal programming; guarantee; Indonesia; infrastructure |
| Index terms: | Indonesia, partnership, net present value, budget constraint, confidence interval, project selection, build-operate-transfer, infrastructure project, proposal, guarantee, methodology, programming, goal programming |
| Subjects: | partnership management, infrastructure and transport systems, statistical analysis, contract structure, algorithms, research methods, Geography, project planning, contractual arrangements, economic analysis, financial and cost management, programming, value management |
| Topics: | Procurement, Stakeholder Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Project Management, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here