Developing a fuzzy multicriteria decision-making model for selecting design-build operational variations

Xia, B; Chan, A P C and Yeung, J F Y (2011) Developing a fuzzy multicriteria decision-making model for selecting design-build operational variations. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 137(12), pp. 1176-1184. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Many academic researchers have conducted studies on the selection of a design-build (DB) delivery method; however, there are few studies on the selection of DB operational variations, which pose challenges to many clients. The selection of a DB operational variation is a multicriteria decision-making process that requires clients to objectively evaluate the performance of each DB operational variation with reference to the selection criteria. This evaluation process is often characterized by subjectivity and uncertainty. To resolve this deficiency, the current investigation aimed to establish a fuzzy multicriteria decision-making (FMCDM) model for selecting the most suitable DB operational variation. A three-round Delphi questionnaire survey was conducted to identify the selection criteria and their relative importance. A fuzzy set theory approach, namely, the modified horizontal approach with the bisector error method, was applied to establish the fuzzy membership functions, which enables clients to perform quantitative calculations on the performance of each DB operational variation. The FMCDM was developed using the weighted-mean method to aggregate the overall performance of DB operational variations with regard to the selection criteria. The proposed FMCDM model enables clients to perform quantitative calculations in a fuzzy decision-making environment and provides a useful tool to cope with different project attributes.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: China; design-build; fuzzy set; multicriteria decision-making
Index terms: selection criteria, investigation, fuzzy set, fuzzy set theory, aggregate, delivery method, decision-making process, China, questionnaire, decision-making, variation, survey, subjectivity, relative importance
Subjects: decision analysis, delivery method, decision-making and optimization, tendering, contractual condition, Geography, data collection methods, risk assessment, human factors and perception, materials science
Topics: Contract Administration, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Risk Management, Procurement
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here