Young, D A; Haas, C T; Goodrum, P and Caldas, C (2011) Improving construction supply network visibility by using automated materials locating and tracking technology. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 137(11), pp. 976-984. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
The accumulation of material buffers is commonly perceived within the construction industry as an effective means of shielding a project from the risks associated with uncertainty in the supply network. Much of the uncertainty arises out of a lack of visibility throughout the construction supply network, in which visibility refers to the level of awareness of the overall state of the supply network. The integration of Automated Materials Locating and Tracking Technologies (AMLTT) within the construction supply network presents a viable solution to this problem. This article presents the results of an investigation that examined the potential for AMLTT to increase work opportunities at the site level as a result of increased supply-network visibility and in turn reduce the dependency on material buffers. The investigation was completed by using a modeling and simulation approach grounded on a solid foundation of field data and experience. The results presented here are increasingly important as leaders in other industry sectors are beginning to report tangible benefits as a result of increased supply-network visibility as a result of the integration of AMLTT within their organizations' supply networks.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | identification; simulation; supply chain management; supply network visibility |
| Index terms: | industry sector, integration, shielding, investigation, buffer, construction industry, modelling |
| Subjects: | analytical methods, data collection methods, industry analysis, organizational analysis, financial risk, safety engineering |
| Topics: | Cost Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here