Bo, X and Chan, A P C (2012) Investigation of barriers to entry into the design-build market in the people's republic of China. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138(1), pp. 120-127. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Although the design-build (DB) system has been demonstrated to be an effective delivery method and has gained popularity worldwide, it has not gained the same popularity in the construction market of the People's Republic of China (PRC). The objective of this study was to investigate the barriers to entry in the DB market. A total of 22 entry barriers were first identified through an open-ended questionnaire survey with 15 top construction professionals in the construction market of China. A broad questionnaire survey was further conducted to prioritize these entry barriers. Statistical analysis of responses shows that the most dominant barriers to entry into the DB market are lack of design expertise, lack of interest from owners, lack of suitable organization structure, lack of DB specialists, and lack of credit record system. Analysis of variance indicates that there is no difference of opinions among the respondent groups of academia, government departments, state-owned companies, and private companies, at the 5% significance level, on most of the barriers to entry. Finally, the underlying dimensions of barriers to entry in the DB market were investigated through factor analysis. The results indicate that there are six major underlying dimensions of entry barriers in DB market, including the competence of design-builders, difficulty in project procurement, characteristics of DB projects, lack of support from public sectors, the competence of DB owners, and the immaturity of DB market. These findings are useful for both potential and incumbent design-builders to understand and analyze the DB market in China.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | barriers to entry; China; construction market; design and build; factor analysis |
| Index terms: | questionnaire, competence, design and build, project procurement, China, survey, academia, investigation, factor analysis, construction professional, construction market, design-builder, dimension, variance, statistical analysis, public sector, owner, delivery method |
| Subjects: | practitioner, data collection methods, contractual arrangements, data science, health monitoring assessment and metrics, Geography, personnel development, professional development, administrative law, statistical analysis, delivery method, market analysis, measurement and scaling, sociology, educational institutions |
| Topics: | Education, Human Resources, Legal Issues, Procurement, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Information Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Health and Safety |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here